SHC queried 100 randomly selected doctors and asked them to select both the most effective and least effective pharmaceutical promotional vehicles. As reported in a September 2016 AMA article, more than 50% of all promotion to physicians is made up of “nonpersonal” communications. Apparently, the days of the in-office “Detail” are over. But is this a good trend for the pharmaceutical industry?
![Pharmaceutical industry's most effective promotional tactics](https://www.surveyhealthcareglobal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/most-effective-pharma-sales-2-1024x908.png)
![Pharmaceutical industry's least effective promotional tactics](https://www.surveyhealthcareglobal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/least-effective-pharma-sales2-1024x908.png)
There are good reasons for pharma to spend less on traditional sales reps. The same AMA article also indicated the percentage of doctors that are willing to see a Sales Rep has dropped from 80% in 2008 to 44% in 2016. Which leads to a dilemma: At the same time that physicians feel a one-on-one visit is the most effective, they also are less willing to see a Sales Rep. There is some good justification for cutting back on face-to-face communications. However, because these are overwhelmingly viewed by physicians as most effective, perhaps more research should be done to identify additional alternatives to the traditional “Detail” visit.